Legal Opinion

Integrated Home Technologies, Inc. v. Draper

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 29, 2000No. 29A02-9909-CV-639PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTINGLY, Judge

Integrated Home Technologies, Inc. (“Integrated Home”) asserts that the trial court abused its discretion when it granted “R” Concrete Specialists, Inc.’s (“Concrete Specialists”) motion to set aside a default judgment.

We agree, and therefore reverse and remand.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On January 25, 1999, Integrated Home filed a complaint against multiple defendants, one of whom was Concrete Specialists. Proper service was obtained on Concrete Specialists. On April 22, 1999, after no one had appeared or answered on Concrete Specialists’ behalf, Integrated Home…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Young v. ButtsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Public Service Commission v. SchallerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Cornelius v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Greengard v. Indiana Lawrence BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Breneman v. SlusherIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. McGrath v. Everest National InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
  3. WW Extended Care, Inc. v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. In re K.G.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Joseph Esparza v. Koren Lopez (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API