United States v. Carlos Pedroza-Rocha
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
The district court dismissed Carlos Pedroza-Rocha's indictment for illegal reentry following removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 , finding that the immigration judge in the underlying removal proceeding lacked jurisdiction. While this appeal was pending, this court issued an opinion in an analogous immigration appeal that forecloses the arguments advanced by Pedroza-Rocha that were adopted by the district court below. For that reason, we REVERSE and REMAND.
I
Defendant-appellee Carlos Pedroza-Rocha, a citizen of Mexico without lawful status in the United States, entered the country on or about March…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ross v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Campbell-Ewald Co. v. GomezSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Knox v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1000Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Green Valley Special Util Dist v. Donna Nelson, etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Erika Yanez-Pena v. William Barr, U. S. Atty GenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- McDonald v. LongleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- Elldakli v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
- New Orleans City v. Aspect EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.