Simpson v. Eichenbrunner
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
Plaintiff has established a prima facie case of breach of warranty. Although the plaintiff’s employer rather than the plaintiff was the legal purchaser of the machine, the plaintiff comes within the extension of the rule of privity as laid down in Greenberg v. Lorenz (9 N Y 2d 195) as between plaintiff and the defendant Leo Eichenbrunner, doing business as Leo’s Hardware & Supply Co. However, there was no privity of contract between plaintiff and the H. D. Hudson Mfg. Co., Inc., manufacturer of the machine, or between the defendant third-party plaintiff Leo Eichenbrunner, doing business as…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Mull v. Colt Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Lonzrick v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1965
- Thomas v. LearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Williams v. Union Carbide Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- O'Halloran v. Toledo Scale Co.New York Supreme Court · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.