Legal Opinion

People v. Murray

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 6, 2008No. 2-06-0378PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Zenoff

Jerome A. Murray appeals his conviction of and sentence for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver (720 ILCS 570/ 401(d) (West 2004)). He contends that his conviction should be vacated and the case dismissed because he was denied his statutory right to a speedy trial (725 ILCS 5/103 — 5(a) (West 2004)) and that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to raise the issue in a motion to discharge. The State argues that he failed to effectively object to delays by making an affirmative demand for trial on the record. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

On December 3, 2004, Murray…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. StatenIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. PecoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. People v. HuffIllinois Supreme Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. HartfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 2022
  2. People v. HamptonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. People v. SHARIFPOURAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. People v. CrossAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
  5. People v. HallAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API