Legal Opinion

Rose v. Hanna Mining Company

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1980No. 46853PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

Defendant operates a ferro-silicon smelter plant. Plaintiff applied for a job as a laborer.

The plaintiff was denied employment solely because he was afflicted with the condition of epilepsy in some degree. In a summary judgment order, the trial court found complete freedom from epilepsy to be a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) for working as a laborer in the defendant's smelter under the state statute prohibiting discrimination in employment. RCW 49.60.180. There are genuine issues as to material facts which preclude a summary judgment. We remand for further proceedings consistent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mrs. Lorena W. Weeks v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company, Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company v. Mrs. Lorena W. WeeksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Holland v. Boeing CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Fahn v. Cowlitz CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Sarruf v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Kimmel v. Crowley Maritime Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1979

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. SellersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Foods, Inc. v. Iowa Civil Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Jane Doe v. Boeing CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Reese v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Jansen v. Food Circus Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API