Dean Technology, Inc. v. CE Power Solutions, LLC
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER:(1) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION (DOC. 21);(2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 28) & DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY BRIEF IN OPPOSITION (DOC. 42); AND(3) GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 24)
TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge.
This civil action is before the Court on three substantive motions: (1) the motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction filed by Defendants CE Power Solutions, LLC and CE Power Solutions of Florida, LLC (Doc. 21)1 and the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- AMF Bruns America, L.P. v. Vantage Mobility International, L.L.C.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
- Cyfred, Ltd. v. WaathdadSuperior Court of Guam · 2026
- MTD Products Inc v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024