Legal Opinion
Noveletsky v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, D. Maine
Decided September 24, 2014No. Civil No. 2:12-cv-00021-NTPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
NANCY TORRESEN, District Judge.
Before the Court are four motions for summary judgment: (1) Defendant Fran*128cine Temkin’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 175); (2) Defendant Alan Silverman’s second motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 178); (3) Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Ine.’s (“MetLife”) motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 182); (4) and Plaintiffs Thomas Heaney and Joshua Rosen-thal’s cross-motion for partial summary judgment against Defendant Temkin (ECF No. 191). For the reasons that follow, the Defendants’ motions…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Calero-Cerezo v. U.S. Dep of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Ruiz-Troche v. Pepsi Cola of Puerto Rico Bottling Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,686 Mary Hayes, Administrator of the Estate of Robert Hayes, Jr., and Eric Hayes v. Douglas Dynamics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McGahey v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2017
- Brett Deane v. Central Maine Power CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024
- Daly v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021