Legal Opinion

Robb v. Cherry

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1896PublishedCited by 10 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal in error from First Circuit Court of Davidson County. J. W. Bonner, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlister, J.

This is an action of detinue to recover the possession of an abstract of title to real estate. Defendant, Cherry, relies upon an outstanding title to the abstract in a third party, and he denies that at the date of the commencement of this action he was in actual or constructive possession of the abstract. The facts disclosed in the record are that one Mrs. Myers was the owner of two lots, and applied to the plaintiff, the Guaranty Loan & Investment Company, of the city of Washington, for a loan of money. Mrs. Myers furnished the company with an abstract of her title to both of said lots, *74whic…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foster v. Chamberlain & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1867
  2. Walker v. FennerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  3. Pittman v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1804
  4. Davis v. HerndonMississippi Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Maddox v. ConeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926
  2. Marlin v. MerrillCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
  3. Hefner v. FidlerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Red Top Cab Co. v. RosenblumCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926
  5. Tennessee Central Railway Co. v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API