Legal Opinion

Ancrum v. Lyft Inc

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided August 30, 2024No. 3:23-cv-01740Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MATTIE RACHELLE ANCRUM, § § Plaintiff, § § V . § No. 3:23-cv-1740-S § LYFT, INC dba LYFT DRIVES § TEXAS, INC, LYFT CENTER, INC, § DARTANYAN JAMERSON and § SPOUSE DOE JAMERSON, JOHN § and JANE DOES I-X, BLACK § CORPORATIONS I-X, and WHITE § PARTNERSHIPS I-X, § § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Mattie Ancrum has filed a third motion for substituted service on Defendant Dartanyan Jamerson. See Dkt. No. 17. United States District Judge Karen Gren Scholer has referred the motion for substituted…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilson v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In the Interest of E.R.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. CostleyTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Garrels v. Wales Transportation, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  5. Wood v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API