United States v. Patane
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
The Government appeals from the district court’s order suppressing the physical evidence against Samuel Francis Patane on charges of gun possession by a felon. The district court based its suppression order on its conclusion that the evidence was insufficient to establish probable cause to arrest Patane. We conclude, contrary to the district court, that probable cause existed to arrest Patane. However, we affirm the district court’s order on the alternative ground that the evidence must be suppressed as the physical fruit of a Miranda violation.
I. BACKGROUND
Patane was…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. PataneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Cortez v. McCauleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
- Griego v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Weiner v. McKeeferyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.