Bedford Materials Co., Inc. v. Leading Technology Composites, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS BEDFORD MATERIALS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 20-1298-EFM-ADM LEADING TECHNOLOGY COMPOSITES, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the court on Plaintiff Bedford Materials, Inc.’s (“Bedford”) Motion to Amend the Complaint. (ECF 18.) Bedford seeks leave to amend its complaint to assert additional factual allegations in support of its existing claims against Defendant Leading Technology Composites, Inc (“LTC”). LTC opposes the amendment as futile, arguing this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Gorsuch, Ltd., B.C. v. Wells Fargo National Bank Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Stevens & Ricci IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.