Legal Opinion

State v. D'ACQUISTO

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1985No. 84-339-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

Domonic D’Acquisto (D’Acquisto) seeks review of a court of appeals’ decision that denied his request for discretionary reversal of his conviction of being a party to the crime of aggravated battery as a result of an assault on the victim James Schoemperlen (Schoemperlen). D’Acquisto argues, and we agree, that the court of appeals applied an erroneous standard in denying his request for discretionary reversal. Nonetheless, we affirm the court of appeals’ decision because we conclude that it reached the correct result in holding that the real controversy was fully tried.

Schoemperlen was driving…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lock v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. WyssWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. LomagroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. McConnohieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. CuylerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. SorensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. GomazWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  4. State v. HammerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  5. State v. CrowleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API