State v. Hammer

Gordon Hammer appeals from a judgment entered after the jury convicted him of one count of aggravated burglary, as party to a crime, five counts of first-degree sexual assault, and one count of armed robbery, as party to a crime, contrary to §§943.10(2)(d), 939.05, 939.63, 940.225(l)(c), and 943.32(2), Stats. Hammer claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in instructing the jury regarding the aggravated burglary. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion when it instructed the jury, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

On April 26 and 27,1995, three women and a…