Legal Opinion
I.R.C. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 15, 2007No. 2D06-0777PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANADY, Judge.
I.R.C. appeals his adjudication for possession of cannabis, which was entered after I.R.C. pleaded no contest reserving the right to appeal the denial of a disposi-tive motion to suppress. The cannabis which I.R.C. sought to suppress was discovered after I.R.C. was removed from his classroom at a public high school by a deputy sheriff and his bag was searched by the deputy. The sole argument presented by I.R.C. on appeal is that the trial court should have granted the motion to suppress because I.R.C.’s “consent to the search” which revealed the cannabis “was not voluntary” but…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. DraytonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Steinhorst v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Bollettieri Resort Villas Condominium Association, Inc. v. The Bank of New York MellonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Conner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Berben v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- State v. GamezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.