Legal Opinion

People v. Jordan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 20, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The totality of the voir dire record demonstrates that defendant made a valid waiver of his right to be present at sidebar discussions with prospective jurors (see People v Antommarchi, 80 NY2d 247 [1992]).

In any event, defendant could not have been prejudiced by his absence from the four sidebar conferences at issue, because in each instance he could not have made a meaningful contribution (see People v Roman, 88 NY2d 18, 26-27 [1996]). Three of the panelists were effectively disqualified by the court for cause as a result of their expressed concern that they could not be impartial (see…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. AntommarchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. RomanNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. CARSON, MATTHEW M., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API