Legal Opinion

State v. Romero

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 16, 2013No. COA12-1499PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DILLON, Judge.

Leo Romero (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s orders modifying the terms of his probation and imposing Confinement in Response to Violation (CRV) for a period of 90 days pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1344(d2) (2011). We hold that Defendant has no right to appeal from these orders, and, accordingly, we dismiss Defendant’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

I. Factual & Procedural Background

On 23 September 2011, Defendant pled guilty pursuant to apleaagreement to two counts of trafficking in opiates and one count of maintaining a place to keep controlled substances. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. State v. PimentalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. TozziCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. North Carolina Department of Revenue v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. State v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  2. State v. FlanaganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  3. State v. FlanaganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  4. State v. OreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  5. State v. OreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API