Legal Opinion · Dissent
People v. Bernard Smith
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided March 6, 1978No. Docket 30241, 77-104Published
1DissentJ. H. Gillis, J.
I respectfully dissent. The Renno case1 set forth the following rule:
"We do not hesitate in this case to prohibit the further use of municipal ordinance or misdemeanor convictions used by the prosecution solely for impeachment purposes. This type of conviction was never intended by our Legislature to fall within the confines of MCLA 600.2158; MSA 27A.2158, or MCLA 600.2159; MSA 27A.2159. This is affirmatively shown by the legislative history of these statutes. It is time that this Court brings our current interpretation of these stat*573utes back in line with their original purposes.” Renno,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kirby v. LarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. RennoMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Attorney General Ex Rel. O'Hara v. MontgomeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Sting v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. RobersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.