Legal Opinion

State v. Brionez

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1977No. 3048PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Chief Judge.

Defendant was convicted of criminal sexual penetration in the second degree by the use of force or coercion which results in personal injury to the victim. Section 40A-9—21(B)(2), N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl. Vol. 6, Supp.1975). His appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence as to “force or coercion” and as to “personal injury”. The evidence as to these items is substantial and sufficient to sustain the conviction. The question discussed is the trial court’s exclusion of testimony concerning the results of a polygraph test. This has two aspects: (1) the standard of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. BellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. DorseyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. RamirezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. State v. HargroveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Dahl v. TurnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Mathis v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. GallegosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. State v. FuentesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Tafoya v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. SessionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API