State v. Kantler
Supreme Court of Minnesota
■ The defendant was arrested, tried, and convicted in the municipal court of Minneapolis, on complaint for selling intoxicating liquor without a license, on June 19, 1884, contrary to the ordinance of the city; and he appeals from the judgment entered upon the conviction and from an order refusing a new trial.
Read the full summary
■ The defendant was arrested, tried, and convicted in the municipal court of Minneapolis, on complaint for selling intoxicating liquor without a license, on June 19, 1884, contrary to the ordinance of the city; and he appeals from the judgment entered upon the conviction and from an order refusing a new trial. The ordinance relating to liquor licenses and the sale of intoxicating liquors, as at first adopted in April, 1884, was as follows, viz.: “An ordinance to license and regulate all persons vending, dealing in or disposing of spirituous, vinous, fermented or malt liquors. “The City…
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
The defendant was convicted upon a prosecution for selling intoxicating liquor without a license, in violation of an ordinance of the city of Minneapolis. The ordinance was originally enacted in April, 1884, and was amended in June, 1884. The grounds upon which the defendant contests the legality of the conviction may be thus stated: (1) The amendatory ordinance was not legally enacted, because its first reading was not at a legal meeting of the common council; (2) the original ordinance was unconstitutional and void, and it was not rendered valid by the amendment, which did not, in terms,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People Ex Rel. City of Rochester v. BriggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Tiernan v. RinkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Gordon v. . CornesNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- In re WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- State v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. CantienySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Ensley ex rel. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- City of Seattle v. PearsonWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Eureka City v. WilsonUtah Supreme Court · 1897
- Stolz v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.