O'Rourke v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Assumpsit on a policy of life insurance.
1Opinion of the CourtStiness, C. J.
This is an action on a policy of life insurance, in which the plaintiff is the beneficiary, upon the life of her son, a boy fifteen years old when the policy was issued.
The defence is that the application contained false answers to questions which are made warranties by the terms of the policy.
To the question : " Has this company ever refused to issue a policy on this life?” the answer was “No.”
The plaintiff admits in her testimony that she knew that the boy had been previously rejected by this company, and says that she and her husband stated the fact to the agent who took the application…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gilson v. SpearSupreme Court of Vermont · 1865
- West v. MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1842
- Morrill v. AdenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1847
- Derocher v. Continental MillsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1870
- Doran v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1877
3Cited by18 opinions
- Elfstrom v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. BrubakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. ZivitzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Highlands Insurance Company v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Violin v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.