Legal Opinion
Granger v. Granger
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided May 26, 1896No. 17,706PublishedCited by 22 opinions
From the Vanderburgh Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.
Ira P. Granger died seized of the real estate here in controversy. The third! item of his will reads as follows:
“Third. I give and bequeath to my third son, Edwin Granger, one-fourth in value of all the real estate of which I may die seized, to have and hold the same during the full term of his natural life, and after his death I devise and bequeath the same to the heirs of his body by him begotten, if there be any such heirs him surviving, and should he have no heirs of his body by him begotten him surviving, then I give and devise the said real estate to him hereinbefore devised to the said…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Shimer v. MannIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Ridgeway v. LanphearIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Jones v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Conger v. LoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- McIlhinny v. McIlhinnyIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Abernathy v. McCoyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926
- Moore v. GaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Quilliam v. Union Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1924
- Girl Scouts of Southern Illinois v. Vincennes Indiana Girls, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2013
- Nickerson v. HooverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.