Legal Opinion

Conger v. Lowe

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1890No. 14,431PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From the Fulton Circuit Court..

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The controversy here is over the construction of a clause in the last will and testament of Lewis B. Conger, late of Fulton county, deceased, which reads as follows:

“ My beloved wife, Hannah, is to have and to hold the two above described pieces of land during her lifetime; at her decease, I will, devise and bequeath the same to my son, Samuel M. Conger, during his natural lifetime: Provided,' He will live on and occupy the same; at his death, or his refusal to live on or occupy the same, then and in that case, as well as at the said Samuel M. Conger’s death, I will, devise and bequeath the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Nichols v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Cowell v. Springs Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Mandlebaum v. McDonellMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Monarque v. . MonarqueNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  5. De Peyster v. . MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1852

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Wescott v. BinfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Diamond v. RotanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Overton v. LeaTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Granger v. GrangerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Girl Scouts of Southern Illinois v. Vincennes Indiana Girls, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API