Legal Opinion
McVeigh v. Harrison
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided December 3, 1937No. 11995PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Russell, Chief Justice.
The entire argument contained in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error is made in support of the one contention that the plaintiff in the lower court can not join J. EL McVeigh in her action against Norman S. McVeigh, because the relation of debtor and creditor does not exist between Norman S. McVeigh and Mrs. Harrison until her claim against him has been reduced to judgment.
The rulings in the first two headnotes do not require elaboration.
In Westmoreland v. Powell, 59 Ga. 256, appeared the following: “Willis Westmoreland committed a trespass upon the person…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Westmoreland v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- Clements v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Gamble v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- McElhaney v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Banks v. McCandlessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McGahee v. McGaheeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Downs v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Keeter v. Bank of EllijaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Baker v. GoddardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- ATLANTA NEWSPAPERS INC. v. DoyalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.