Baker v. Goddard
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
1. The court did not err in overruling the oral .motion and objections of the defendant to the allowance of the amendments setting up counts 2 and 3 of the petition, upon the ground that these counts sought to set up new and distinct causes of action. It clearly appears from counts 2 and 3 that the. same collision and injuries were alleged by the petitioner, the petitioner by the separate counts relying upon distinct and separate acts of 'negligence of the defendant for a recovery. It is the right of every plaintiff to allege separate and distinct bases for a recovery in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- DeLacy v. Hurst, Purnell & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Culberson v. Alabama Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Jones v. HogansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Johns v. NixSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Trawick v. ChamblissCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hoard v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Nathan v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Wood v. Hub Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Ambrose v. HackertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Atlanta Metallic Casket Co. v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.