Cray, McFawn & Co. v. Hegarty, Conroy & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
My judgment in this cause is that the complaint should be dismissed as against both defendants with costs, which will include all taxable disbursements and allowances.
I. A. My subject matter jurisdiction herein is based on diversity of citizenship.
The plaintiff, Cray, McFawn & Company, is a corporation of Michigan, engaged in the business of the purchase and sale of corporate securities.
The defendant Hegarty, Conroy & Co., Inc., hereinafter often referred to as Hegarty, is a corporation of the State of New York, also engaged in that business.
The defendant Atlas…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Roberts v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Straton v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Davidson v. RobieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
- Kirk v. SiquierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Evans v. Riverside International RacewayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Flanigan v. Security-First Nat. BankDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941
- Lyons v. StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.