Legal Opinion

Montano v. Wet Seal Retail, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 7, 2015No. B244107PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, P. J.

The Wet Seal Retail, Inc. (Wet Seal), appeals from the denial of its motion to compel arbitration of this wage and hour action brought by employee Elizabeth Montano. Wet Seal also challenges the grant of Montano’s motion to compel discovery responses. We affirm the order denying the motion to compel arbitration and dismiss the challenge to the discovery order as nonappealable.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

In October 2011, Montano filed this putative class action against Wet Seal, alleging that it failed to offer all required meal and rest periods to its California…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. People v. ZapienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Huff v. Securitas Sec. Servs. United States, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Deck v. Developers Investment Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2023
  3. Hamilton v. Albertson's Companies, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2024
  4. Huff v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. Woodie v. AER Electronics, Inc. CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API