Legal Opinion

Gaelco S.A. v. Arachnid 360, LLC

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided December 21, 2017No. 16 C 10629PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Another object the [sic] invention is to provide a method to manage the refereeing of the games played on amusement machines wherein a human or non-human referee can make decisions at a remote site. Monitoring or Refereeing may occur in real time or with a time delay, based, at least in part, on multimedia information captured from the amusement machines which may communicate over a network such as the Internet. Accordingly, the system and method enables game play to be monitored and refereed, cheating to be reduced and enhances fair competition in games and between players....

[T]he…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Hallinan v. Fraternal Order of Police of Chicago Lodge No. 7Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Charles Shamoon v. City of San AntonioDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2019
  2. Quartz Auto Technologies LLC v. Grubhub Holdings, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
  3. Xoran Technologies, LLC v. Planmeca USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API