Bergh v. Hines
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtJacobs, J.
Claiming that a fence erected by the defendants interfered with their long-established easement to a beach along the easterly side of the defendants’ lot in Chatham, the plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive relief in the Land Court in 1992. The plaintiffs contend that the fence hugs the shoreline and confines their use to a narrow corridor at the water’s edge. The judge, following a trial and a view, declared that the upland line of the easement, originally described as “a line parallel *591with and five feet back from the mean high water line,” was not relocated when the mean high water…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- County of St. Clair v. LovingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Labounty v. VickersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Adams v. FrothinghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
- Michaelson v. Silver Beach Improvement Ass'n, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Wellwood v. Havrah Mishna Anshi Sphard Cemetery Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- White v. HartiganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- Smaland Beach Association, Inc. v. GenovaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- Glick v. Principal Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 2002
- Lingley v. Executive Office of Environmental AffairsMassachusetts Superior Court · 2001
- Providence & Worcester Railroad v. RivardMassachusetts Superior Court · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.