Legal Opinion

Dennehy v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 12, 1987No. LUBA 86-098; CA A44018Published

1Opinion of the Court

740 P.2d 806 (1987)

87 Or.App. 33

Thomas P. DENNEHY, Petitioner,

v.

CITY OF PORTLAND, Respondent.

LUBA No. 86-098; CA A44018.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted June 15, 1987.

Decided August 12, 1987.

Gregory J. Howe, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Kathryn Beaumont Imperati, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Jeannette M. Launer, Legal Counsel for Portland Development Com'n.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.

NEWMAN, Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA's affirmance of the City of Portland's Tenth Amendment…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Johnson v. Star MacHinery CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Hay v. Oregon Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State Ex Rel. Cox v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API