Legal Opinion

Winchester v. Parm

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided March 7, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:

The objection which the defendant makes to the complainant’s title hinges upon the validity of the title conveyed by the sheriff in the foreclosure proceedings as against the deed delivered by Richardson' to the Underwriters Realty and Mortgage Company. Both the mortgage and deed were recorded on the same day. The mortgage was noted on the record as recorded at 11:35 A. M. of that day (the Statute, Sec. 1380, Revised Code 1915, quoted infra, required this); but no notation of the hour of recording was noted upon the record of the deed, the statute requiring none.

The defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. DavisCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1925
  2. Ferris v. Chic-Mint Gum Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1924
  3. Doe v. RoeSuperior Court of Delaware · 1901
  4. Doe v. RoeSuperior Court of Delaware · 1911
  5. Gallagher v. True American Publishing Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Widder v. LeedsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1974
  2. Conly v. Industrial Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1943
  3. Satterthwaite v. JackCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API