Legal Opinion

Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Louisville Title Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 15, 1969No. 27189PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Circuit Judge:

The issue here is whether plaintiff’s liability under the real estate salesman’s bond issued by it on October 1, 1964, pursuant to the provisions of Title 46, § 311(5), Code of Alabama as amended, is a single penalty bond, or whether it is subject to several recoveries in the penal amounts of $1,000.00 each. The bond covers Frank S. Lacey, Jr., a real estate salesman. The district court concluded that it was a single penalty bond. We affirm.

The proceedings began as a bill for interpleader. 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1335, 2361. At the time of the district court’s consideration,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Paulsell v. PetersWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Wiggins v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Western Surety Company v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  5. Miles v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company v. Louisville Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API