Legal Opinion

State v. Garrity

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 12, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Clinton District Court. — -Hon. C. M. Waterman, Judge. The defendant was indicted and tried for the crime of seduction, was found guilty, and sentenced to be confined therefor for the period of eighteen months in the state penitentiary. He appeals from said judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.

1 I. Defendant contends that the court erred in this: That after the trial had proceeded several days, and on October 6, 1894, one of the jurors in the case being ill, the court, against defendant’s objections, and :'dn opposition to his request, then made, that the jury be kept together, did continue, or adjourn, the further hearing of said cause until October 10, 1894, and excused the jury until that time. The complaint is that the court should have kept the jury together during said adjournment. Our statute provides: “The jurors sworn to try an indictment, may, at any time before the final…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. FelterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  2. State v. RainsbargerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  3. State v. DonovanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  4. Lyons v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  5. State v. FertigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GiudiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API