Legal Opinion
GEICO Insurance v. Sullivan
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided April 7, 2017Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff commenced this subrogation action to recover the sum of $12,069.59,* representing the amount it had paid to its subrogor for lost wages and for property damage to the subrogor’s vehicle as a result of a collision involving her vehicle and defendant’s vehicle. The complaint alleged that the collision had been caused “solely by the negligence of the Defendant ... in the ownership, operation, maintenance and control” of defendant’s vehicle. After defendant failed to appear or answer, plaintiff moved for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Winkelmann v. Excelsior InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Federal Insurance v. Arthur Andersen & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Hamilton Fire Insurance v. GregerNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Kaf-Kaf, Inc. v. Rodless Decorations, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Antonitti v. City of Glen CoveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999