Legal Opinion

Hawker v. Consovoy

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided January 22, 2001No. Civ.A. No. 00-2106(JAP)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PISANO, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

On May 2, 2000, Ian Hawker, Nelson Miles, and Jermaine Lawrence (“Named Plaintiffs”), three inmates incarcerated at Riverfront State Prison in Camden, New Jersey, filed a class action complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Andrew Consovoy, William T. McCargo, Loraine Kulick, Peter W. Loos, Dominic Porrovecchio, Rolando Gomez Rivera, Rachel Torres-Chowaniec, and Ruby J. Washington (“Defendants”), the members of the New Jersey State Parole Board (“Parole Board”).1 (Compl. at ¶¶10-22). The complaint alleges that the Parole Board knowingly and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bartek v. State, Department of Natural Resources, Division of ForestryAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Chester Upland School District v. PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Rahim v. HoldenDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2012
  4. Rosati v. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API