Legal Opinion
State v. Schoenbneelt
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 25, 1976PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.
On a trial to a jury, the defendant, Walter Sehoenbneelt, was found guilty of the crime of larceny in the first degree, in violation of § 53a-122 of the General Statutes. In his appeal from the judgment rendered, he has assigned error in the court’s denial of his motion to suppress certain evidence, in its charge, and in its denial of his motion to set the verdict aside.
The statements of facts filed pursuant to §§ 631A and 632A of the Practice Book reveal that the state offered evidence to prove and claimed to have proved the following facts: On August 16, 1974, at 2:15 a.m., Henry E. Burt,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dyke v. Taylor Implement Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. PundySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. BadgettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- State v. GabrielSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. RoySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.