Allen v. Canadian General Electric Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice J. Clarence Herlihy at the Appellate Division, insofar as that opinion relates to the significance and effect of CPLR 302 (subd [a], par 3, cl [i]). We are not required to pass upon and thus do not address the significance and effect of CPLR 302 (subd [a], par 3, cl [ii]) (cf. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v Woodson, 444 US 286).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum. Question certified…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bruce Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Ingraham v. CarrollNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Ronar, Inc. v. WallaceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Trafalgar Capital Corp. v. Oil Producers Equipment Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Kelly v. MD Buyline, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.