Legal Opinion

McBryde v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 9, 1925No. 4310PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

In an indictment charging the unlawful use of the United States mails for fraudulent purposes, in violation of the provision of section 215 of the Criminal Code (Comp. St. § 10385),. it is sufficient to set forth generally the fraudulent scheme and artifice which the aeeused devised and intended to devise, and in the execution of which fraudulent scheme he is charged with the unlawful use of the United States mails. Durland v. U. S., 161 U. S. 306, 315, 16 S. Ct. 508, 40 L. Ed. 709; Rosen v. U. S., 161 U. S. 29, 34, 16 S. Ct. 434, 40 L. Ed. 606; Preeman v. U. S., 244 F. 1, 8, 156 C. C. A. 429.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Ziang Sung Wan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Preeman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Busch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  3. Hyney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  4. United States v. Aubrey EvansCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  5. Kercheval v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API