Legal Opinion
Robert M. Sinskey v. Pharmacia Ophthalmics, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 28, 1992No. 92-1216PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
Robert M. Sinskey appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California holding that United States Patent No. 4,601,720 is invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). Because we agree with the district court that Sinskey has not raised a genuine issue as to any material fact and that Pharmacia Ophthalmics, Inc. is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
Dr. Robert M. Sinskey is the named inventor and sole owner of the patent in suit, United States Patent No. 4,601,720 (the ’720 patent). On February 20, 1990, Sinskey…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Franks v. NimmoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- John P. Mack v. United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- The D.L. Auld Company v. Chroma Graphics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- In Re James A. Smith and James H. McLaughlin and Sterling Drug, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Jiminez Ex Rel. Estate of Serrano v. All American Rathskeller, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Dustin James v. Deborah HaleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Paragon Podiatry Laboratory, Inc. v. Klm Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Lugo Montalvo v. Sol Meliá Vacation ClubSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2015
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.