Legal Opinion

Fasco Industries, Inc. v. Goble

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 30, 1996No. 96-66PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

678 So.2d 916 (1996)

FASCO INDUSTRIES, INC., etc, et al, Petitioners,

v.

Bill E. GOBLE, Respondent.

No. 96-66.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

August 30, 1996.

David B. King and Mayanne Downs of King & Blackwell, P.A., Orlando, for Petitioners.

Marcia K. Lippincott of Marcia K. Lippincott, P.A., Maitland, for Respondent.

THOMPSON, Judge.

Fasco Industries, Inc., Fasco Controls Corporation, Electro Corporation and Lazerdata Corporation ("Petitioners") seek a writ of certiorari. Petitioners contend that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law in denying their…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mabie v. Garden Street Management CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Lightsey v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Schimmel v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. Red Oak Farm, Inc. v. City of OcalaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  5. Anderson v. AndersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. FryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Shooster v. BT Orlando Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. CO Motors, Ltd. v. Andrews Automotive Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Farino v. Farino, No. Fa 98-0408944 S (May 12, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API