Legal Opinion
Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. Fry
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 19, 1997No. 96-1211, 96-1215PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
693 So.2d 1003 (1997)
HOECHST CELANESE CORPORATION, and Shell Oil Company d/b/a Shell Chemical Company, Appellants,
v.
Robert FRY, Gerald Garske, Edwin Kasanders, Jr., Edwin Kasanders, III, Mill Dam Development Corporation, Ralph Rudolph and Johnnie Voorhees, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Appellees.
Nos. 96-1211, 96-1215.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 19, 1997.
Rehearing Denied June 11, 1997.
Aragon, Burlington, Weil & Crockett, P.A., Rudolph F. Aragon and Kevin C. Kaplan, Miami; Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, L.L.P., Hector Torres, Paul…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Randle-Eastern Ambulance Service v. VastaSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Miller v. Fortune Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Hinchee v. FisherSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Mabie v. Garden Street Management CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Agripost, Inc. v. Miami-Dade CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- ENVIRONMENTAL CONFED. OF SOUTHWEST FL., INC. v. IMC Phosphates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Saka v. SakaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Hardman v. KoslowskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Harley v. Health Center of Coconut Creek, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.