Legal Opinion

Barteldes Seed Co. v. Gunn

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 17, 1916No. 7745PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from County Court, Canadian County; R. B. Forest, Judge. Action by the Barteldes Seed Company against C. E. Gunn and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

The plaintiff in error recovered judgment against C. E. Gunn in the county court of Canadian county in April, 1915, for the sum of $231.29. Thereafter, in order to enforce the collection of said Judgment, it sought to subject thereto a debt due by the Stiles Construction Company to C. E. Gunn.

It appears from the evidence here that .on February 16, 1915 the said Gunn made a contract with the Stiles Construction Company whereby he obligated himself to do all the hauling required in the erection of the post office at El Reno, for which he was to receive so much per 1,000 tons…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. HebardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wineblood v. PayneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Hillcrest Medical Center v. MonroyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. Harvey Blake HaddockUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2023
  4. John Mashburn v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of OklahomaBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API