Legal Opinion

Feistner v. Swenson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1985No. 14730PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSHEIM, Chief Justice.

Darrell Feistner (Feistner) appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of Edward L. Swenson (Swenson). We reverse.

Feistner originally sought a temporary injunction to enjoin Swenson from diverting and draining surface water upon Feistner’s land. Following a hearing, that request was denied. Feistner then filed an amended complaint requesting $12,000 damages and a permanent injunction.

The Feistner land is servient to the Swenson land. Feistner alleged Swenson ditched, channeled and filled his land, and cut through a township road, all of which diverted the water…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Gross v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Stenholtz v. ModicaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Thompson v. AndrewsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Uken v. SloatSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Winterton v. ElversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Aberdeen Production Credit Ass'n v. Redfield Livestock Auction, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Rumpzka v. ZubkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Miiller v. County of DavisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Surat Farms, LLC v. Brule County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API