Legal Opinion · Dissent

Denver Area Labor Federation, AFL-CIO v. Buckley

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 23, 1996No. 95SC314Published

1DissentChief Justice Vollack

The majority holds that the language of section 1—45—116(l)(a), IB C.R.S. (1996 Supp.) of the Campaign Reform • Act (the CRA) should be read broadly to include all political entities which collect and manage private funds, thereby preventing these organizations from engaging in certain political activities. I dissent because I believe the language of section 1—45-116(l)(a) does not include these entities. I would hold that the Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority (the CCIA) falls outside the reach of section 1—45—116(l)(a) of the CRA because it is a hybrid political organization managing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pensioners Protective Ass'n v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
  2. Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Denver School District 1District Court, D. Colorado · 1978
  3. Stong v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  4. Denver Area Labor Federation, AFL-CIO v. MeyerColorado Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API