Karras v. Michaelis
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The State acquired by condemnation property of petitioner’s contract vendors, Mollica. A settlement of the Mollicas ’ claim against the State for damages for the taking was made for $17,000. The State also ‘ ‘ deeded us back ’ ’, as Mr. Mollica testified (or released an easement as other parts of the record suggest), a portion of the property taken. That portion is the subject of this proceeding. The contract vendee of the land, petitioner Karras, applied to the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Hempstead for a variance permitting the erection of a one-family dwelling.
Coneededly, as…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Cange v. ScheyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Campus v. DelanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Coliseum Builders, Inc. v. KennedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Zulkofske v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Inc. Village of MuttontownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Thompson v. CurcioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989