Pfotzer v. United States
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND JUDGMENT
LATCHUM, Chief Judge.
This case is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P. All parties admit there are no genuine issues of any material fact and the question for determination is simply a matter of law.1 2The plaintiffs E. John Pfotzer and Elizabeth W. Pfotzer* seek to recover an alleged federal income tax overpayment of $3,187.47 on their joint tax return for the calendar year 1963 and the plaintiff Edmond Pfotzer (“Edmond”) seeks to recover a similar overpayment on his individual tax return for the calendar year 1963 in the amount of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Real Estate - Land Title & Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Alabama By-Products Corporation v. George D. Patterson, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Hood v. McConemyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971
- Rock v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Sid W. Richardson Foundation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Scott Paper Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Pfotzer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976