Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 27, 1964No. 40390PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

In the trial court, plaintiff Sarah Hamilton sued her son, William Bowen, in an equitable action for the cancellation of a deed executed on October 6, 1958, which conveyed approximately 30 acres of land from the mother to the son. Grounds alleged were lack of consideration and fraud, deceit and misrepresentation on the part of the son. The mother’s second husband was made a party to the action as an occupant of the premises, upon the defendant son’s motion, apparently in anticipation of the cross petition he later filed asking that his own title to the premises be quieted.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Skinner Et Ux. v. Scott Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Hallam v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Nicholson v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Walden v. ViningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Waggoner v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Gray v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  3. Martin v. BastionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Mauch v. MauchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  5. Bowen v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API