Legal Opinion

Hibernia Insurance v. O'Connor

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1874PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Superior Court of Detroit.

1Opinion of the CourtOooiiEy, J.

None of the errors assigned in this case appear to be well taken.

When the agent of the insurance company delivered the policy and renewal receipt with bis name written upon them, and as completed instruments, neither he nor the company could be at liberty to object afterwards that they were not countersigned by him.

The fact that the defendant in error calls herself Con-nor instead of O’Connor, is immaterial. She was proved to *242be known by both names, and in this case contracted in the name of O’Connor. The identity is clearly made out.

There was no error in admitting evidence that neither the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nickell v. Phoenix InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. Aurora Fire & Marine Insurance v. KranichMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. McCord v. Masonic Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. International Fair & Exposition Ass'n v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. American Central Insurance v. McCrea, Maury & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API