Commonwealth v. Dise
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.
The primary question on this appeal from the defendant’s convictions of assault with intent to rob and of unarmed robbery is the validity of an arrest in Springfield by police officers of the town of Ludlow. Arguing that this arrest was illegal, the defendant, prior to trial, filed a motion to suppress any evidence, including identifications, obtained as a consequence of the arrest.
The only witnesses at the hearing on the motion were the defendant and the arresting Ludlow police officer, James Nowakowski. Nowakowski’s version of the events, which the judge found credible, was as follows.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Commonwealth v. CiampaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Commonwealth v. WrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Commonwealth v. OrtizMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Commonwealth v. GullickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FullerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Commonwealth v. McCormickMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Commonwealth v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. Va Meng JoeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- Commonwealth v. ClaiborneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.