Legal Opinion

Fitzpatrick v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Michael D. Stallman, J.

This motion for summary judgment requires examination of the “relation-back” doctrine. Does defendant’s commencement of a third-party action seeking contractual and common-law indemnification for negligence permit a plaintiff to subsequently sue the third-party defendant directly for negligence? Did the third-party defendant’s nonassertion of the Statute of Limitations in the third-party action waive such a defense against the plaintiff?

Defendant Roadway Contracting, Inc., moves for an order dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint and all cross claims…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Felker v. Corning Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Duffy v. Horton Memorial HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Bellevue South Associates v. HRH Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Liverpool v. ARVERNE HOUSES, INC.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Zaveta v. PortelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API