Legal Opinion

Bellevue South Associates v. HRH Construction Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1991PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Kaye, J.

This appeal — in a case seeking damages for the replacement of defective floor tiles throughout plaintiff owner’s housing complex — presents two discrete issues: first, whether plaintiff can recover its replacement costs against the tile manufacturer in tort (strict products liability) or is limited to contract remedies and second, whether the flooring subcontractor should be indemnified by the tile manufacturer on a theory of breach of implied warranty.

For the reasons that follow, we conclude that plaintiffs tort claim against the tile manufacturer should have…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Parochial Bus Systems, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Hecht v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. New York University v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Denny v. Ford Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. NY Univ. v. CONT'L INS CONew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. 532 Madison Avenue Gourmet Foods, Inc. v. Finlandia Center, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2001

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API